O’Toole’s shaded past

A question for the group:Erin O’Toole’s talked a lot about “getting tough on China”. As far as I know: no one’s held him to account about his track record on China. In 2012, O’Toole was a cabinet minister in a government that signed a FIPA deal with China that remains in effect until 2044. Despite 10 years of state sponsored industrial espionage scandals, and Nortel’s resulting bankruptcy, Erin O’Toole gave China the right to sue us for blocking any Canadian project they invest in, for any reason at all, even if that project is doing something illegal. Meanwhile, China is free to kidnap Canadians at will.Has anyone asked O’Toole about this?.

What do you risk in a Conservative vote?

What are you risking with a frivolous vote for the Federal Conservatives? O’Toole won the leadership by courting the extreme right-wing.  He was very proud of this.  Who then, is the extreme right-wing?

That would be Christian fundamentalists that would be the same group as the Alberta UCP!  At risk is our public health care; make no mistake about it!  Woman’s rights will become a thing of the past! Funding for Universities will be further curtailed!  Only the very rich will be able to afford a secondary education!  Our immigrants will be from the USA, WASP, or foreign degrees. All of the reasons it is less expensive.  You lived through this in the Ralph Klein Years. You have Conservative Governments in 8 out of 10 provinces! Our very constitution is at risk!

What are you risking with a frivolous vote for the Federal Conservatives? O’Toole won the leadership by courting the extreme right-wing.  He was very proud of this.  Who then is the extreme right-wing?

That would be Christian fundamentalists that would be the same group as the Alberta UCP!  At risk is our public health care; make no mistake about it!  Woman’s rights will become a thing of the past! Funding for Universities will be further curtailed!  Only the very rich will be able to afford a secondary education!  Our immigrants will be from the USA, WASP, or foreign degrees. All of the reasons it is less expensive.  You lived through this in the Ralph Klein Years. You have Conservative Governments in 8 out of 10 provinces! Our very constitution is at risk!

Leave the Liberals in place until we reduce the number of Conservatives in provinces! They only took office with the help of Bell Media and thier 200 newspapers workiing overtime.

Funding set aside for daycare will be withdrawn and a suitable story attached to it.  

Remember, Scheer was turfed out by them because he “missed an empty net.” They intended to re-write the constitution.  They are again in that position.  And I will guarantee you it is front and center on O’Toole’s mind.

Funding set aside for daycare will be withdrawn and a suitable story attached to it.  

Remember, Scheer was turfed out by them because he “missed an empty net.” They intended to re-write the constitution.  They are again in that position.  And I will guarantee you it is front and center on O’Toole’s mind.

Under Scheer’s attempt at re wrting our constituion, the Conservative Facebook was alive with speculation on the matter. This time under O’Toole there is not a whisper.

Carbon Capture, O’Toole style.

Carbon Capture, O’Toole style.

Carbon is captured from cement plants or industry in general then it is pumped down hole into an existing oil field

where, acting as a solvent it mixes with the oil present there.

This puts the field under pressure. When the valve is opened there is a rush of Carbon Dioxide desribed as sounding like a jet plane. This will vent for a few hours then, oilshows up boiling because it is saturated with carbon dioxide.

Everything that is captured is turned loose again!

O’Toole has tapped into a Harper scheme without knowing what it is.

Critique of the English Debate

It is time to put the Liberals in strong! Trudeau made a deal with Quebec to put 8 billion dollars into their child care program. Today the Premier of Quebec said “it wasn’t needed” It is time to clean the slate of Conservatives!

My view is it is all Verbal diarrhea Can you Imagine what kind of shape we would be in now if O’Toole was leading us through this pandemic? We would have been on the “let God Sort it out” train for the duration. #leadership

From <https://www.linkedin.com/feed/>

Critique of the English Debate.

Much was left out and curtailed by the Conservatives because of their accounting methods!

They made much of “no Conditions”

Conservatives put all the incoming cash into General Revenues then, spend at random out of that account.

Health payments from Ottawa would go into General Revenues if they had their way!

Ottawa has asked for an accounting that health care money was spent on health care and, the Conservatives don’t care for this.

On the Quebec pipeline pushed by O’Toole.  Firstly Quebec lost a major electrical contract with the USA .  This, leaves them short billions.  They have suggested they will accept a pipeline from the west if, the west will agree to buy their surplus generation.   Unfortunately, Alberta’s electricity is owned by the cities, Edmonton (EPCOR) and Calgary (ENMAX) this supplements our tax base so, there is no way wean work with PQ on this item. Quebec, on the other hand picked up 3 billion a year from California when Ford cancelleld Ontario’s cap and trade program. However, that should be gone now, as in timed out.

O’Toole is fanning the flames of dissent trying to start something with a  pipeline. 

Irving Oil Company gets it’s oil off the ocean on the east coast and supplies Montreal refinery with I think, finished product.    Montreal Refinery gets its bulk oil in over the
Great Lakes.  Both these systems are far less expensive than is pipeline construction and oil paying for it.

So the debate went round and round, the truth was never heard.  Trudeau kept quite though the whole exchange, showing good sense. He did point out the 8 billion paid into Quebec’s daycare was the first province to get it, the plan is in mothion to cover all the other provinces the same way, to scale.

Trudeau came under attack on the Kabul people left behind. He barely got out that  20,000 people were on their way using a third country and Jagmeet Singh

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

 jumped in with the complaint about 20 or so people remaining even though Trudeau said they were working on it.  Sing spent the night trying to make a hit he lost ground from the French debate.

Mr. Blanchet made a good show for PQ even when he was on the defensive from Jagmeet.

Jagmeet bounced Trudeau on having the worse record of the G7.  Actually Canada has the lowest GDP in the G7, Must be what he was talking about. 

Canada has the 10th largest economy in the world, valued at around $U.S. 1.74 trillion as of 2019.

And, that is pretty dam good!

From <https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/group-of-seven-g7-countries.html>

More on the G7 Comparison. 

In 2019 — the first year of the federal carbon pricing system, commonly called the “carbon tax” — Canada produced 730 megatonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, an increase of one megatonne — or 0.2 per cent — over 2018.

However, the economy grew faster than emissions did in 2019 — which means the country’s “emissions intensity” is lower than it has been in the past.

The 730 megatonnes of emissions recorded in 2019 is slightly higher than the 723 megatonnes Canada churned out in 2015, the year Trudeau first took office. This was because of increased industry!

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

O’Toole has said that, if he’s elected, he will push the reset button on Canada’s climate plan, returning to the previous national target of reducing emissions by 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. Trudeau said O’Toole threatens to drag Canada back to “the Harper years,” when former prime minister Stephen Harper committed to less ambitious environmental action.

Typical Conservative who, a month ago had no plan at all has decided to go back to 2005 numbers because they are lower. The man seems to want to play it bent as a first choice!

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

“We have to win back trust on this issue — we haven’t met the expectations of Canadians on climate change,” O’Toole said. He defended his lower target, saying his plan is actually doable and would not tank Canada’s resource-rich economy.

He could have started with the current truth if he wanted to win back trust!

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

“Mr. O’Toole can’t even convince his party that climate change is real because they voted against that,” Trudeau said, referring to a failed Conservative party convention motion to declare that “climate change is real.”

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh also piled on, saying “Justin Trudeau has failed all of us. You had six years and you’ve got the worst track record in the G7 after six years.”  jAGMEET can go sit with O’Toole.

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042>

Canada’s housing stock is among the priciest in the world, with the average price of a single family home costing well over $1 million in the Toronto and Vancouver urban areas. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association’s MLS system, the average price of a home in Canada is $716,000, an eye-popping figure that means property ownership is a distant dream for many.

“There’s a housing crisis and Mr. Trudeau is making it worse,” O’Toole said. To address this, the Conservative housing plan commits to building one million new homes over three years while easing mortgage requirements and making more federal land available for development.  The point is, you have watched for 3 weeks while our lumber out of the midwest BC and US has been Torched.  This was our lumber inventory!  Lumber is now a semi precious commodity and housing is being built on current costs, older housing is going up to reflect the value of the lumber in them.  Don’t sell cheap.  In answering this O’Toole decides to game it. Make a deal with the most fluent party of our population giving them tax concession or access to cheap money.

From <https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/english-leaders-debate-election-2021-1.6170042

What’s wrong with O’Toole?

He’s all over the place switching ideas and positions on just about everything as he moves forward In my reasoning, I can see a 5th wave and a 6th wave of the Corono Virus before it is done with it. This beasty is better at survival than we are. It will continue to change upwards than down as it doesn’t want to kill off its host.

Can you imagain a Federal Conservative Governmenet looking after you in these comming events? Hell, Kenny and Shandro can’t even get a vaccine passport moving! O’ Toole says he is againt it. Having a choices is more important than living or dying!

O’Toole was given the leadership by the extream right wing of the Conservative Party! None of their policies has shown up in his cuddly converations, to date. He was very proud to be accepted by the ugly right wing. It means, Corporate rule.

We continue to have troubles with the post media who were invited into Canada by Stephen Harper. The Calgary Herald will allow me to post then, change my posts to repetitave garbage. It seems to be their level on most things.

Why the new dam in BC?


Weatherford Project detailed.

First Published SUNDAY, APRIL 01, 2012  
Weatherford Project the start of a gigantic transfer of water to the US. The whole program is adequately explained here: NAWAPA  (Credit to Richard Weatherhill)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERq86OlS-_k  This #video is a US concept shown in its best light bought into whole heartedly by the Harper and Prentice Conservatives. (This is the US view of what they want)
The *Conservative Government has a fully mechanically engineered project sitting on their shelf from the 1980s.  It is as valid today as when it was paid for. Harper has removed the Navigable water protection from the River making it all possible.  It’s in play now!  #Trudeau killed the move.]


This is the Weatherford project, the design being to move up to 2/3rds of the flow of the Peace River into the USA! 
#The project has 8 large electrical lift stations in it, each one using the power of a large city.  This is immense and under a Conservative Government taxpayers will pay for the infrastructure and private companies will take home the profits.
Under a “good” Liberal Government the price of construction would be carried by those who need the water, not those who supply it.  Think here of our present electricity debacle!

Government’s direction will be handled by private industry and paid for by the Alberta Taxpayers.
For those of you in southern Alberta; the St. Mary’s system and involved in the Western Irrigation District; Did you sign up for this?  Many of you were kicked off the board while others with cash were able to buy rock pile so they could claim adjoining property thereby being put on the board.


Mike Cardinal reworked the Western Irrigation board while he was selling off Crown Grazing Lands on the East Slope of the Rockies to the Agra Food Industry.  Rules of water ownership run First in Line, First in Time and these properties are where all of our groundwater used for drinking originates!  
When a River drops to 1/3 of its flow it goes stagnant, the river dies.  Kenny is okay with this as is a long list of Conservatives before him.


The US has announced it will build a rail from our North Coast to the US to move oil.  Why would they do this when they are oil self-sufficient.   I think rail is to move The Peace River by rail into the US!

As far as the dam goes ; It can only produce 1100 mw. That means it cannot pay for itself. It will however create a sump from which to draw huge amounts of water. This is what you get if O’Toole gets in. These plans cover every major river and lake in Canada, not just Alberta.

The Conservative plan to export (give away) our bulk water is under way!

=Correction.

#Bills C48 and C69 strip away all the Conservative Controls they put on Canada’s water (Removed by Harper/Kenny) over all the water in Canada, not just the Peace River. Under the agreements, the US has the first call on the water. If there is enough left for one nation, the US gets it. We will be buying our water from the USA if O’Toole gets in and he will eliminate those two bills, It won’t be Nestle it will be Conservative individuals getting the graft from the water sales.

They have been after this for more than 20 years! If you set down for an evening read of  https://lnkd.in/gQYAAqch you will find what #water titles I could find at the time some of the names on them will be interesting.

The Dam they are building now in northern BC will produce 1100 MW, not enough to pay for itself. It’ purpose is that of a sump, from which to draw water to ship south by pipeline. 6′ diameter pipe! This is why the bills C46 and C69 were so important to the Conservatives!.

More on the subject:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERq86OlS-_k
  This video is a US concept shown in its best light bought into whole heartedly by the Harper and Prentice Conservatives.

The *Conservative Government has a fully mechanically  engineered project sitting on their shelf from the 1980s.  It is as valid today as when it was paid for. Harper has removed the Navigable water protection from the River making it all possible.  It’s in play now!
This is the Weatherford project, the design being to move up to 2/3rds of the flow of the Peace River into the USA! 
#The project has 8 large electrical lift stations in it, each one using the power of a large city.  This is immense and under a Conservative Government taxpayers will pay for the infrastructure and private companies will take home the profits.
Under a “good” Liberal Government the price of construction would be carried by those who need the water, not those who supply it.  Think here of our present electricity debacle!
Government’s direction will be handled by private industry and paid for by the Alberta Taxpayers.
For those of  you in southern Alberta; the St. Mary’s system and involved in the Western Irrigation District; Did you sign up for this?  Many of you were kicked off the board while others with cash were able to buy rock pile so they could claim adjoining property thereby being put on the board.
Mike Cardinal reworked the Western Irrigation board while he was selling off Crown Grazing Lands on the East Slope of the Rockies to the Agra Food Industry.  Rules of water ownership run First in Line, First in Time and these properties are where all of our ground water used for drinking originates!
http://albertathedetails.blogspot.ca/2012/03/alberta-water-privatization-index.html


Alberta–The Details: Haper setting up to export our water!
May 22, 2007Harper and the US dominated Fraser institute have made their declaration to include bulk water export into the NAFTA agreement! 39th Parliament, 1st Session The Standing Committee on International Trade has the honor .

And, back to the present. If O’Tool should get in, he will do away with bills C46 and C69 and rivers and lakes across Canada will become cash cows for Conservative insiders.

Bill C69 the Conservatives want to get rid of:

#Bill C69 did away with two pieces of Harper/Kenny legislation that was irresponsible, to say the least. 

Following is the effect of Bill C69

First off  National Energy Board Act:  This was legislation that allowed Harper to become a dictator in his own mind at least.  Any conflict with a native group could be set aside by the Minister in charge.   In action, it caused endless delays in the West coast pipeline.  Reason?  The US does not want us shipping off the west coast it will cut deeply into their markets in Indochina and China and, they will not be able to use their oil supply on or off as a bargaining chip!
Secondly: Canadian Navigable Waters Act; was changed by Harper/Kenny to a free-for-all.  One outstanding item is the BC dam on the Peace River.  A navigable river, the dam was built and was criticized for not being able to produce enough electricity to pay for its self.  It was however built to create a sump in the Peace River suitable for drawing large amounts of water out of.   This brings me to the #Weatherford Project.   So named after the company who designed and specked it.
Weatherford is immensely designed to move 2/3rds of the flow of the Peace River to the US border.  If Conservatives build this Canadian’s will pay for the build so the US can get cheap water.   If the Peace River has been turned back into navigable water that project is dead.
What do I mean by immense?  The design calls for 3 large diameter pipelines and 6 pumping stations.  Each pumping station to use the electrical power of a city!
The Conservatives again looking after US interests, not Canada’s!

SUMMARYPart 1 enacts the Impact Assessment Act and repeals the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012. Among other things, the Impact Assessment Act(a) names the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada as the authority responsible for impact assessments;(b) provides for a process for assessing the environmental, health, social and economic effects of designated projects with a view to preventing certain adverse effects and fostering sustainability;(c) prohibits proponents, subject to certain conditions, from carrying out a designated project if the designated project is likely to cause certain environmental, health, social or economic effects, unless the Minister of the Environment or Governor in Council determines that those effects are in the public interest, taking into account the impacts on the rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada, all effects that may be caused by the carrying out of the project, the extent to which the project contributes to sustainability and other factors;(d) establishes a planning phase for a possible impact assessment of a designated project, which includes requirements to cooperate with and consult certain persons and entities and requirements with respect to public participation;(e) authorizes the Minister to refer an impact assessment of a designated project to a review panel if he or she considers it in the public interest to do so, and requires that an impact assessment be referred to a review panel if the designated project includes physical activities that are regulated under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act;(f) establishes time limits with respect to the planning phase, to impact assessments and to certain decisions, in order to ensure that impact assessments are conducted in a timely manner;(g) provides for public participation and for funding to allow the public to participate in a meaningful manner;(h) sets out the factors to be taken into account in conducting an impact assessment, including the impacts on the rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada;(i) provides for cooperation with certain jurisdictions, including Indigenous governing bodies, through the delegation of any part of an impact assessment, the joint establishment of a review panel or the substitution of another process for the impact assessment;(j) provides for transparency in decision-making by requiring that the scientific and other information taken into account in an impact assessment, as well as the reasons for decisions, be made available to the public through a registry that is accessible via the Internet;(k) provides that the Minister may set conditions, including with respect to mitigation measures, that must be implemented by the proponent of a designated project;(l) provides for the assessment of cumulative effects of existing or future activities in a specific region through regional assessments and of federal policies, plans and programs, and of issues, that are relevant to the impact assessment of designated projects through strategic assessments; and(m) sets out requirements for an assessment of environmental effects of non-designated projects that are on federal lands or that are to be carried out outside Canada.Part 2 enacts the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, which establishes the Canadian Energy Regulator and sets out its composition, mandate and powers. The role of the Regulator is to regulate the exploitation, development and transportation of energy within Parliament’s jurisdiction.The Canadian Energy Regulator Act, among other things,(a) provides for the establishment of a Commission that is responsible for the adjudicative functions of the Regulator;(b) ensures the safety and security of persons, energy facilities and abandoned facilities and the protection of property and the environment;(c) provides for the regulation of pipelines, abandoned pipelines, and traffic, tolls and tariffs relating to the transmission of oil or gas through pipelines;(d) provides for the regulation of international power lines and certain interprovincial power lines;(e) provides for the regulation of renewable energy projects and power lines in Canada’s offshore;(f) provides for the regulation of access to lands;(g) provides for the regulation of the exportation of oil, gas and electricity and the interprovincial oil and gas trade; and(h) sets out the process the Commission must follow before making, amending or revoking a declaration of a significant discovery or a commercial discovery under the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act and the process for appealing a decision made by the Chief Conservation Officer or the Chief Safety Officer under that Act.Part 2 also repeals the National Energy Board Act.Part 3 amends the Navigation Protection Act to, among other things,(a) rename it the Canadian Navigable Waters Act;(b) provide a comprehensive definition of navigable water;(c) require that, when making a decision under that Act, the Minister must consider any adverse effects that the decision may have on the rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada;(d) require that an owner apply for an approval for a major work in any navigable water;(e) set out the factors that the Minister must consider when deciding whether to issue an approval;(f) provide a process for addressing navigation-related concerns when an owner proposes to carry out work in navigable waters that are not listed in the schedule;(g) provide the Minister with powers to address obstructions in any navigable water;(h) amend the criteria and process for adding a reference to navigable water to the schedule;(i) require that the Minister establish a registry; and(j) provide for new measures for the administration and enforcement of the Act. Part 4 makes consequential amendments to Acts of Parliament and regulations.

How Conservatives Manage Climate.

Conservatives will write a glossy set of laws governing climate or any other thing. Then, they will fire the department that is to administer those laws. Usually there are not enough people left to handle the phone traffic loading on more inconvenience. There is no one left to enforce the laws.

The next step of the plan come in with their response. They pull out this set of shiny laws and say “look at the good things we did” and “this proves it’s not our fault.

It’s hard enough to work with this on a provincial level, on a Federal Level?

Conservatives do not have a climate change plan nor, do they want one!

The Conservatives when faced with an environment problem, will write a new set of laws to cover whatever situation they happen to have. Then, they will fire the staff or most of the staff who were to answer phones or enforce laws.
Then, when taking complaints from the public, will parade out this crisp new set of laws saying “look what we did!” and “this proves it is not our fault” Not only is this done on environmental issues it is done any time the need arises.