Why do conservatives reject the 10 dollar daycare offers?

Do you wonder about the lack of agreement on the #10.00 daycare by the three conservative provinces?

It comes down to the conservative bookkeeping system and their thrust for reducing corporate taxes. I call it corporate communism.

All the money under conservatives goes into one account, general revenues. If they run short, the account is run into a deficit position and, there it stays.

The FED knows this and asked for an accounting of where the funds are spent. The cons call this interference into provincial business. They would want a cash dump into general revenues sealed with a thank you. And daycare would settle for.10 cents on the dollar.

Going back to the Klein period awash with cash, he refused health transfers rather than account for his spending!

Alan’s scam was an effort to take the blazing spotlight from Jason Kenny.

In the 3 months previous I had busted Kenny 3 times in trying to take down the Transmountain Expansion project. For one effort, he robbed the Government Pension funds to build a pipeline east, to no place in particular. This had he gained approval, would have pitted Alberta Government Pensions against the CPP invested in Trans Mountain.

On another not so sensational deal he was sitting next to a lawyer on a TV show while she bad-mouthed Ottawa and the Trans Mountain. All the time, nodding and smiling his agreement. He was relentless!.

Behind this is Shell oil on the Gulf coast who will see prices on our oil rise because of our direct access to China and Indonesia.

There is a block of misguided anti-pipeline people out there! Fifty or more countries are shipping into the oil market. If we don’t ship, they will fill the orders.. Whether that pipeline is active or not has nothing at all to do with global warming.

For Alan’s report see https://susanonthesoapbox.com/

Pack of Wolves, insights.

The front 3 are the oldest. They set the pace. The next 5 are strongest and fittest and protect the pack from Frontal attack. With this system, the wolves in the middle are safe from attack. The 5 behind are also the strongest and fittest assuring security. The one behind is the leader, he is prepared to fill any position needed and support wherever needed.

Leading does not mean being at the forefront. It’s taking care of the whole team

text and logo over a background picture of a building

Five Eyes Alliance and Huawei

For other uses, see Five Eyes (disambiguation).”FVEY” redirects here. For the album by Shihad, see FVEY (album).

Five Eyes
Official languagesEnglish (de facto)
TypeIntelligence alliance
Contributors Australia Canada New Zealand United Kingdom United States
• Atlantic Charter14 August 1941
• BRUSA Agreement17 May 1943

The Five Eyes (FVEY) is an intelligence alliance comprising AustraliaCanadaNew Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.[1] These countries are parties to the multilateral UKUSA Agreement, a treaty for joint cooperation in signals intelligence.[2][3][4]

The origins of the FVEY can be traced back to informal secret meetings during World War II between British and US code-breakers that started before the US entry into the war, followed by the Atlantic Charter agreed by the Allies to lay out their goals for a post-war world. Canadian academic Srdjan Vucetic argues that the alliance emerged from Winston Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech, given at Westminster College, Missouri, in 1946,[5] in particular Churchill’s belief the conflict with the Soviet sphere of influence would become a hot war unless the English-speaking democracies learned to cooperate:

Neither the sure prevention of war, nor the continuous rise of world organisation will be gained without what I have called the fraternal association of the English-speaking peoples. This means a special relationship between the British Commonwealth and Empire and the United States… the continuance of the intimate relationship between our military advisers, leading to common study of potential dangers…”[6]

As the Cold War deepened, the intelligence sharing arrangement became formalised under the ECHELON surveillance system in the 1960s.[7] This was initially developed by the FVEY to monitor the communications of the former Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, although it is now used to monitor communications worldwide.[8][9]

In the late 1990s, the existence of ECHELON was disclosed to the public, triggering a major debate in the European Parliament and, to a lesser extent, the United States Congress. The FVEY further expanded their surveillance capabilities during the course of the “war on terror“, with much emphasis placed on monitoring the World Wide Web. The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden described the Five Eyes as a “supra-national intelligence organisation that does not answer to the known laws of its own countries”.[10] Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY has been spying on one another’s citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on surveillance of citizens.[11][12][13][14]

In spite of continued controversy over its methods, the Five Eyes relationship remains one of the most comprehensive known espionage alliances in history.[15]NSA Headquarters, Fort Meade, Maryland, United StatesASIO central office, Canberra, AustraliaGCHQ, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United KingdomCSE, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

#Britian, #Australia, #New Zealand, #Canada all had elections in 2019. We know for certain that Bell Media (a very mischievous company)and their 200 newspapers interfered in Canada’s election. How much do you want to bet they interfered in the other countries elections also? And lastly the United States who own and view Bell Media as a major resource. Australia’s conservative win came as a surprise to the whole population!

Huawei was fully involved in BC’s tele communions in 2019 and, BC was the only province not to go Conservative. There is no evidence or suggestion that @Huawei messed with the election in any way.

This brings us to Canada’s face off with the rest of the the 5 eyes members. One of which is a protector of their private industry and the others Conservatives installed by that same industry.

Trudeau has a headache ahead of him. The scenario I outlined Andrew Scheer was criticized because he missed an empty net.

Imperative we ditch minimum 3 Conservative Governments!

Our country is presently populated by 8 #Conservative provinces and, only 6 are required to re-write our constitution along with a Conservative Federal Government.

The only possible exception is Saskatchewan, the rest including Quebec got in by #media manipulation of Bell Media and their 200 newspapers. Bell was installed in Canada by Stephen Harper!

Bottom line, we have to get rid of a minimum of 3 provincial Governments in the next election to avoid a meltdown of our country.

Another crisis is nearly on us and that is water. Canada has it and the USA doesn’t. The Conservatives wanted very much to export the Peace River in total through a giant pipeline, the #Weatherford project. Fully engineered in the 80s it has been on the Conservative wish list since. The design is to move 2/3rd of the river south and when a river gets down to 1/3 of its flow, the river dies.

The SiteC dam in BC is a sump from which to draw the water. The design of the dam will not allow it to produce electricity at a profit.

Beyond California and North Dakota, the #Wyoming river is in a state of massive decline. That is drinking water for millions.

Under the Conservative plan, Canadians will pay for the infrastructure and private industry will collect the profit.